On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:29:31AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:05:07PM +0800, Philip Li wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:20:24AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > I was seeing this type of mess when trying to build with gcc-8.1, and > > > > could not figure it out either. So I just gave up and went back to > > > > gcc-7 for the time being. I don't think it's anything new you did here. > > > thanks, we will follow up to exclude this pattern in report in bot side. > > > > I don't think that's the right solution here. People just don't want > > to see errors/warnings that they didn't introduce. It'd be unfortunate > > to start skipping warnings about syscalls entirely. > > Can you build a kernel with gcc-8.1 right now? I sure can not, these > warnings are all over the place... thanks for feedback, we will follow up to do more internal testing for gcc-8.1, right now, will roll back to gcc-7.3. > > greg k-h
