On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:29:31AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:05:07PM +0800, Philip Li wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:20:24AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > I was seeing this type of mess when trying to build with gcc-8.1, and > > > could not figure it out either. So I just gave up and went back to > > > gcc-7 for the time being. I don't think it's anything new you did here. > > thanks, we will follow up to exclude this pattern in report in bot side. > > I don't think that's the right solution here. People just don't want > to see errors/warnings that they didn't introduce. It'd be unfortunate > to start skipping warnings about syscalls entirely. this is valid concern. Usually when using new compiler, we will need tune the bot a little to exclude certain issues, some are input by users. Of course, we will limit pattern to be very specific to avoid missing real issues. Based on feedback, i will switch back to gcc-7.3, and does more homework to understand the diffs of gcc-8.1.
