On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 04:05:07PM +0800, Philip Li wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:20:24AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > I was seeing this type of mess when trying to build with gcc-8.1, and > > could not figure it out either. So I just gave up and went back to > > gcc-7 for the time being. I don't think it's anything new you did here. > thanks, we will follow up to exclude this pattern in report in bot side. I don't think that's the right solution here. People just don't want to see errors/warnings that they didn't introduce. It'd be unfortunate to start skipping warnings about syscalls entirely.