Hello, On Mon 26-02-18 20:11:13, Pali Rohár wrote: > Hi! In UDF specification is on more pages written that developers who > want to implement UDF should complete OSTA UDF Registration Form. > > List of registered developers and UDF implementations is available at > the web pages: > > http://www.osta.org/specs/isvsearch.htm > http://www.osta.org/specs/isvmssearch.htm > > On that list is already a record with Developer ID "Linux -- UDF" > registered by BitWizard B.V. company. > > Linux kernel uses Developer ID "Linux UDFFS". Same ID is used by > udftools/mkudffs. > > I already contacted Roger Wolff from BitWizard B.V. company and he wrote > me that he haven't done anything with UDF like 10-15 years. And he gives > me permission to use that registered Developer ID. > > What do you think should we register Developer ID "Linux UDFFS" to OSTA > as this ID is already used by Linux kernel and mkudffs tool? And if yes, > who should do that? Seems like registration is done for a company / > organization, not for project name. > > Or use ID "Linux -- UDF" which is already registered? > > I successfully contacted OSTA email reflector and I got response, that > OSTA UDF reflector hasn't been used in several years, but filling > registration form and choosing developer ID is still possible. Frankly, I don't care since I don't think there's any real value behind that string :). Just out of laziness I'd stay with what we have. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
