Hi! In UDF specification is on more pages written that developers who want to implement UDF should complete OSTA UDF Registration Form. List of registered developers and UDF implementations is available at the web pages: http://www.osta.org/specs/isvsearch.htm http://www.osta.org/specs/isvmssearch.htm On that list is already a record with Developer ID "Linux -- UDF" registered by BitWizard B.V. company. Linux kernel uses Developer ID "Linux UDFFS". Same ID is used by udftools/mkudffs. I already contacted Roger Wolff from BitWizard B.V. company and he wrote me that he haven't done anything with UDF like 10-15 years. And he gives me permission to use that registered Developer ID. What do you think should we register Developer ID "Linux UDFFS" to OSTA as this ID is already used by Linux kernel and mkudffs tool? And if yes, who should do that? Seems like registration is done for a company / organization, not for project name. Or use ID "Linux -- UDF" which is already registered? I successfully contacted OSTA email reflector and I got response, that OSTA UDF reflector hasn't been used in several years, but filling registration form and choosing developer ID is still possible. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
