Re: Fix(es) for ext2 fsync bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <20070220213014.GC5264@nifty>, Valerie Henson writes:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:20:21AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:

> And POSIX also states that sync() is only required to schedule the
> writes, but may return before the actual writing is done.  Looks like

One more reason to form a group to discuss POSIX updates/changes (as per LSF
last week).

> the only way you can guarantee data is on-disk according to POSIX is
> to reboot the system after every synchronous write.  Man, we file
> systems developers sure have it easy!

No need to be that extreme. :-) It should be enough to just unmount all file
systems, unload all fs and disk drivers, then reload+remount everything.
No?

> -VAL

Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux