On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 21:39 +0000, Valerie Henson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:30:25PM -0800, Junfeng Yang wrote: > > On 2/20/07, Valerie Henson <val_henson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >Google. (GoogleFS runs on top of ext2.) > > > > It's surprising to know that... I guess they reply on GoogleFS's own > > replication and checksumming for consistency. > > Yep, they just want a local file system with ultrafast on-line > performance. They don't care about recovery time particularly because > of the GoogleFS replication (although I heard rumors they have some > fast fsck scheme, maybe resembling the dirty bit stuff I did last > year). I wonder if they would consider this a important bug? I know nothing about GoogleFS, but I would guess that they have more sophisticated recovery than relying on an fsync shortly before a crash to ensure data integrity. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
