On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 11:11 -0800, Junfeng Yang wrote: > Hmm. If jfs has the problem, it is a bug. jfs is designed to > handle > this correctly. I'm pretty sure I've fixed at least one bug > that > eXplode has uncovered in the past. I'm not sure what was > mentioned in > the presentation though. I'd like any information about > current > problems in jfs. > > > I believe you have fixed the JFS fsync bug, Dave. It was caused by > reusing a directory inode as a file inode. If the machine crashes > later, fsck would think this file is a directory, and clear all its > data. Yeah. That one was fixed a while back. Thanks for clearing this up. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
