On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 00:30 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> diff -rupX /home/jack/.kerndiffexclude
> linux-2.6.18-rc6/fs/jbd/commit.c
> linux-2.6.18-rc6-1-orderedwrite/fs/jbd/commit.c
> --- linux-2.6.18-rc6/fs/jbd/commit.c 2006-09-06 18:20:48.000000000
> +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.18-rc6-1-orderedwrite/fs/jbd/commit.c 2006-09-08
> 01:05:35.000000000 +0200
> @@ -160,6 +160,117 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
> return (ret == -EIO);
> }
>
> +void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs)
Is there any reason this couldn't be static?
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
> + wbuf[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
> + /* We use-up our safety reference in submit_bh() */
> + submit_bh(WRITE, wbuf[i]);
> + }
> +}
I'm rebasing the ext4 work on the latest -mm tree and would like to
avoid renaming this function in the jbd2 clone.
Thanks,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
