On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 22:32 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 06:37:10PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > Use binfo->type instead of binfo->feature_dev to decide whether a
> > feature device was detected during feature parsing. A subsequent
> > commit will delay the allocation of the feature platform device
> > to feature_dev_register() and remove binfo->feature_dev.
> >
> > This commit does not introduce any functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal <basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> > - New patch extracted from last patch of v3 series.
> > ---
> > drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > index 758673b0290a..a9ec37278b2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ static int parse_feature_port_afu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > return create_feature_instance(binfo, ofst, size, FEATURE_ID_AFU);
> > }
> >
> > -#define is_feature_dev_detected(binfo) (!!(binfo)->feature_dev)
> > +#define is_feature_dev_detected(binfo) ((binfo)->type != DFL_ID_MAX)
>
> I still doesn't get why put the change here. How it resolves my concern
> compared to v3?
Could you elaborate on your concern? I moved this change into a
separate commit so that it is not lost in other changes, but I don't
see how the two definitions would not be functionally equivalent. Would
it help to extend the commit description along the following lines?
1. Before this series, binfo->feature_dev was initialized to NULL by
devm_kzalloc() in dfl_fpga_feature_devs_enumerate(). After this
series, binfo->type is initialized to DFL_ID_MAX in
dfl_fpga_feature_devs_enumerate().
2. Before this series, binfo->feature_dev was set to a non-NULL
pointer in build_info_create_dev(), which in turn was called from
parse_feature_fiu(). After this series, binfo->type is set to a
non-DFL_ID_MAX value, as returned by dfh_id_to_type(), in
parse_feature_fiu().
3. Before this series, binfo->feature_dev was reset to NULL at the
end of build_info_commit_dev(). After this series, binfo->type is
reset to DFL_ID_MAX at the end of build_info_commit_dev().
Thanks,
Peter
>
> Thanks,
> Yilun
>
> >
> > static int parse_feature_afu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > resource_size_t ofst)
> > --
> > 2.47.0
> >
> >
