> > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2022 11:09 AM > > To: Zhang, Tianfei <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; Weight, Russell H > > <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx>; trix@xxxxxxxxxx; mdf@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Cc: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>; Matthew Gerlach > > <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] uio: dfl: add HSSI feature id > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Wu, Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Friday, March 11, 2022 10:47 AM > > > > To: Weight, Russell H <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx>; Zhang, Tianfei > > > > <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>; trix@xxxxxxxxxx; mdf@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > > > fpga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Cc: Xu, Yilun <yilun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>; Matthew Gerlach > > > > <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v1] uio: dfl: add HSSI feature id > > > > > > > > > On 3/7/22 22:43, Tianfei Zhang wrote: > > > > > > From: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > Add the feature id of the OFS High Speed Serial Interface > > > > > > subsystem to table of ids supported by the uio_dfl driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c | 2 ++ > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c b/drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c index > > > > > > 89c0fc7b0cbc..660e1d0bf6b9 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_dfl.c > > > > > > @@ -45,9 +45,11 @@ static int uio_dfl_probe(struct dfl_device > > > > > > *ddev) } > > > > > > > > > > > > #define FME_FEATURE_ID_ETH_GROUP 0x10 > > > > > > +#define FME_FEATURE_ID_OFS_HSSI 0x15 > > > > > > > > Where is the "OFS" coming from? is it for all OFS device or a specific card? > > > > Anyway, could we have a matched name per public table? > > > > https://github.com/OPAE/linux-dfl-feature-id/blob/master/dfl-feature > > > > -ids.rst > > > > > > Yes, I think a matched name of public table will be better. How about the " > > > FME_FEATURE_ID_HSSI"? > > > > No. We already have the same name for id 0x6 defined in drivers/fpga/dfl.h > > #define FME_FEATURE_ID_HSSI 0x6 > > Is it possible change the "FME_FEATURE_ID_HSSI" to " > FME_FEATURE_ID_LEGACY_HSSI", and the new one is " > FME_FEATURE_ID_HSSI"? I am not sure who owns the ID allocation table, and why 0x6 is changed to "Legacy" HSSI but I feel it's better to have a specific prefix for this HSSI instead, I hope we don't have to change this 0x15 HSSI to another legacy one when someone adds a new HSSI. This is for FPGA, everybody could implement his own HSSI, generic name should be avoid when possible, and a better rule when managing the feature IDs. >
