On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 6:34 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are we
> > > spending too much time on LTS? How on earth do we prioritize projects
> > > with all these drive by bots?? Why can't we support large engineering
> > > efforts better???) than technical.
> >
> > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)".
> > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big room
> > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want.
>
> Would this make sense to include the MM folks as well? Certainly MM
> has made the same choice as XFS ("No automatic backports, we will cc:
> stable on patches that make sense").
Yeh that makes sense.
Added MM to that session.
Thanks,
Amir.
