On 04/09/2014 09:40 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 10:25:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>> maintainers would have no idea that a new syscall has been added. >>> >>> If i386 has the new syscall, scripts/checksyscalls.sh will catch it and >>> inform us about it during our next kernel build. >>> >>> If you add it to x86_64 only, bad luck for anyone else ;-) >> >> Maybe we should change scripts/checksyscalls.sh to check the x86_64 >> list of syscalls, and not i386? >> >> It's been a long time since "all the world's an i386" --- these days, >> it's "all the world's an x86_64". :-) > > Let the kbuild people (and their employers) fight over it... > I'm missing context here, but as an x86 maintainer I have no intention of allowing system calls that aren't x86-specific to be added to x86-64 only. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
