On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 07:16:25PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139523745403081&w=2 > > I tried applying this patch on top of xfstests commit 3948694eb1, but > running on ext4.git's test branch, which has the your cross-rename > patches applied: > > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git/commit/?h=test&id=b7bcc46d4f80139930c2e6bd04ff8ebbff121bc9 > > I see the following: > > BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block Fri Apr 4 23:21:50 UTC 2014 > Device: /dev/vdb > mk2fs options: -q > mount options: -o block_validity > FSTYP -- ext4 > PLATFORM -- Linux/i686 candygram 3.14.0-00061-gb7bcc46 > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -q /dev/vdc > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o block_validity /dev/vdc /vdc > > generic/323 [23:22:03] [23:22:04] [not run] > generic/323 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall > generic/324 [23:22:04] [23:22:05] [not run] > generic/324 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall > generic/325 [23:22:05] [23:22:06] [not run] > generic/325 -- kernel doesn't support renameat2 syscall > Not run: generic/323 generic/324 generic/325 > > Is there anything obvious that I might be doing wrong? I only wired up the syscall for x86_64. Who's responsible for adding all the syscall tables for the various architectures? Thanks, Miklos -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
