> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-ext4-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-ext4-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rogier Wolff > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:30 PM > To: Andreas Dilger > Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: fsck performance. > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 03:24:18PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > ... > > Second: e2fsck is too fragile as it is. It should be able to handle > big filesystems on little systems. I have a puny little 2GHz Athlon > system that currently has 3T of disk storage and 1G RAM. Embedded > Linux systems can be running those amounts of storage with only 64 > or 128 Mb of RAM. I have to second this comment. One of our NAS has 256 MBytes of RAM (and they wanted 64) with a 3TB disk, 2.996TB of which is an EXT4 file system. With our 2.6.32.11 kernel and e2fsprogs version 1.41.3-1, all I get is a segfault when I run fsck.ext4. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
