Re: fsck performance.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:20:56AM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> I wouldn't be surprised if I'd need more than 3G of RAM. When I
> extrapolated "more than a few days" it was at under 20% of the
> filesystem and had already allocated on the order of 800Gb of
> memory. Now I'm not entirely sure that this is fair: memory use seems
> to go up quickly in the beginning, and then stabilize: as if it has
> decided that 800M of memory use is "acceptable" and somehow uses a
> different strategy once it hits that limit.

OK. Good news. It's finished pass1. It is currently using about 2100Mb
of RAM (ehh. mostly swap, I have only 1G in there). Here is the patch.

	Roger. 

-- 
** R.E.Wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxx ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 **
**    Delftechpark 26 2628 XH  Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233    **
*-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --*
Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. 
Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! 
Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux