Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:56:07 -0400
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jim owens <jowens@xxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxx, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxx>, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx>, kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090905212732.GB27650@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jim owens <jowens@xxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxx, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxx>, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx>, kernel list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx, rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 11:27:32PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Thanks, and thanks for nice article!

I agree; it's very nicely written, balanced, and doesn't scare users
unduly.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
  - From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: Rob Landley
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: jim owens
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: Rob Landley
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: Ric Wheeler
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: Jonathan Corbet
- Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
  - From: Pavel Machek

Prev by Date: Re: wishful thinking about atomic, multi-sector or full MD stripe width, writes in storage
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Remove journal_checksum mount option and enable it by default
Previous by thread: Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
Next by thread: Re: [testcase] test your fs/storage stack (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]