Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:46:32 +0800 > Coly Li <coyli@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Thanks for the replying :-) >> >> Jose R. Santos wrote: >>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:36:05 +0800 >>> Coly Li <coyli@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Now in my mind there are several words for ext4 patches, most frequently one are "patch queue". >>>> >>>> I see the patches in patch queue from >>>> http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out/ . >>>> Also I confirm some of the patches are in ext4 git tree now, but I am not sure for two questions: >>>> 1) Whether all the patches are in ext4 git tree ? >>> Yes, all these patches should be in ext4 git tree. >>> >>>> 2) This patch queue is only used to push ext4 patch into upstream ? >>> The patch queue series is divided into stable and unstable patches. >>> The stable patches are the one usually the ones used to push back >>> upstream, while the unstable section has the patches for development >>> purposes only and are not ready for pushing upstream (and some may >>> never make it in). >> How to recognize which patch is stable patch and which one is unstable patch ? > > Look in the series file. The mark where the stable patches end is > documented there. > Find it now. Thanks for your explaining :-) >>>> Also there is a patch-queue git at http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git , is it same to the >>>> patches in http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/ ? >>> Same thing bug in git format. I believe Ted updates his patch queue >>> from the patches in the git tree repo, so if you want latest/greatest >>> the git tree is what you want. >>> >>>> Thanks for clarifying :-) >>>> >>>> >>> -JRS > > -JRS -- Coly Li SuSE PRC Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
