Thanks for the replying :-) Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:36:05 +0800 > Coly Li <coyli@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Now in my mind there are several words for ext4 patches, most frequently one are "patch queue". >> >> I see the patches in patch queue from >> http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out/ . >> Also I confirm some of the patches are in ext4 git tree now, but I am not sure for two questions: >> 1) Whether all the patches are in ext4 git tree ? > > Yes, all these patches should be in ext4 git tree. > >> 2) This patch queue is only used to push ext4 patch into upstream ? > > The patch queue series is divided into stable and unstable patches. > The stable patches are the one usually the ones used to push back > upstream, while the unstable section has the patches for development > purposes only and are not ready for pushing upstream (and some may > never make it in). How to recognize which patch is stable patch and which one is unstable patch ? > >> Also there is a patch-queue git at http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git , is it same to the >> patches in http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/ ? > > Same thing bug in git format. I believe Ted updates his patch queue > from the patches in the git tree repo, so if you want latest/greatest > the git tree is what you want. > >> Thanks for clarifying :-) >> >> > > -JRS -- Coly Li SuSE PRC Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
