On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:46:32 +0800 Coly Li <coyli@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the replying :-) > > Jose R. Santos wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:36:05 +0800 > > Coly Li <coyli@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Now in my mind there are several words for ext4 patches, most frequently one are "patch queue". > >> > >> I see the patches in patch queue from > >> http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/LATEST/broken-out/ . > >> Also I confirm some of the patches are in ext4 git tree now, but I am not sure for two questions: > >> 1) Whether all the patches are in ext4 git tree ? > > > > Yes, all these patches should be in ext4 git tree. > > > >> 2) This patch queue is only used to push ext4 patch into upstream ? > > > > The patch queue series is divided into stable and unstable patches. > > The stable patches are the one usually the ones used to push back > > upstream, while the unstable section has the patches for development > > purposes only and are not ready for pushing upstream (and some may > > never make it in). > > How to recognize which patch is stable patch and which one is unstable patch ? Look in the series file. The mark where the stable patches end is documented there. > > > >> Also there is a patch-queue git at http://repo.or.cz/w/ext4-patch-queue.git , is it same to the > >> patches in http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/ ? > > > > Same thing bug in git format. I believe Ted updates his patch queue > > from the patches in the git tree repo, so if you want latest/greatest > > the git tree is what you want. > > > >> Thanks for clarifying :-) > >> > >> > > > > -JRS > -JRS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
