Nicolas de Pesloüan schreef: > Can you also please try to change the order of the scanzas in > /etc/network/interfaces, so that iface br0 comes before iface eth1 in > the file ? ifup -a is expected to bring the interface in the order > they appear in the file... I tried that. I'm not posting all the outcomes of all the commands here, because it didn''t change the situation :-(. So no success ... > > Also, you could add "bridge-fd 0" in the br0 stanza. Because you > bridge is by design loop-free, there is no reason to wait 32 seconds > before entering the forwarding stat. Thnx :-). That saves me some time! Now, I changed my wireless security to unsecure, and I was able to get this: => with this configuration, the bridge works! auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto br0 iface br0 inet dhcp bridge_ports eth1 bridge-fd 0 auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual auto eth1 iface eth1 inet manual wireless-essid ##SSID## jochus@Bacardi ~ $ ping www.google.be PING www.l.google.com (74.125.77.99) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from ew-in-f99.google.com (74.125.77.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=74.5 ms 64 bytes from ew-in-f99.google.com (74.125.77.99): icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=17.4 ms 64 bytes from ew-in-f99.google.com (74.125.77.99): icmp_seq=3 ttl=242 time=21.4 ms But, when I add eth0 to bridge_ports, it doesn't work any longer So, maybe, we should try to focus why it doesn't work without security. If that works, we could check the WPA side. But I think we first need the bridge running in a "easy" situation, with no security _______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list Bridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
