Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote: > Well, seeing as both modprobe and a minimal shell are part of busybox > which is included in over 90%+ of Linux based embedded systems and that > the script is trivial, not to mention that you can just have the > application call modprobe directly, just as it will be calling ioctl() > in your case, thereby negating the need for both script and shell at > all, I do believe that complexity wise my solution still has some merit. I agree. When you say "have the application call modprobe directly", I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Are you talking about a call to the kernel (a syscall) or a library function? The kernel has the syscall sys_init_module(), which I'm considering using. Is there some mobprobe library call that might make sense to use? Thanks for the feedback. -- Tim ============================= Tim Bird Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America ============================= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
