Re: Recommendation for activating a deferred module init in the kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 13:33 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> But even after all optimizations CONFIG_MODULES=y will still cause a 
> significant additional cost [1] when thinking in the dimensions of 
> Tim's "the 30 or so Linux-tiny patches that I use get me about 110k of 
> reductions.  For me, this is about 5% of my kernel size" statement in 
> another thread.

Yes. If the system in question is currently being built without
CONFIG_MODULES, that's fairly much a no-go for my alternative
suggestion.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Linux MMC Devel]     [U-Boot V2]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux