On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:20:22AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 09:47 +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> > This may sound like a stupid question, but why are you compiling the
> > modules statically?
>
> I wondered that.
>
> One potential reason to avoid modules is that they waste RAM -- you have
> to allocate an integral number of pages for each one, which means an
> average of 2KiB wasted for each module you load. Although that isn't
> much, it's not zero either. It might be possible to optimise that by
> 'packing' module allocations, if you're careful about it.
>...
> So the only real reason I can see to avoid modules in the _current_
> kernel would be the wasted RAM, which should be something we can
> address.
>...
You miss the size increase imposed by CONFIG_MODULES=y.
E.g. setting CONFIG_MODULES=y in the arm collie_defconfig will
increase the size of vmlinux by 14% (sic).
I haven't investigated why it takes that much space, but stuff like
kernel/module.o taking 23kB and each EXPORT_SYMBOL requiring a few
bytes simply cannot be completely eliminated.
> dwmw2
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-embedded" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
