On 9 March 2018 at 08:37, Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
<sai.praneeth.prakhya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h index
>> > f5083aa72eae..f1b7d68ac460 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/efi.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
>> > @@ -966,6 +966,8 @@ extern struct efi {
>> > unsigned long flags;
>> > } efi;
>> >
>> > +extern struct mm_struct efi_mm;
>> > +
>> > static inline int
>> > efi_guidcmp (efi_guid_t left, efi_guid_t right) {
>>
>> Ugh, I can see three problems with this patch:
>>
>> 1)
>>
>> Why is the low level asm/efi.h header polluted with two of the biggest header
>> files in existence, to add a type to _another_ header (efi.h)?
>>
>> 2)
>>
>> Why is <linux/sched/task.h> included if what is being relied on is mm_struct?
>>
>> 3)
>>
>> But even <linux/sched/mm.h> looks unnecessary in efi.h, a simple forward
>> declaration of mm_struct would do ...
>>
>> The high level MM and sched headers should be added to the actual .c files that
>> make use of them.
>
> Ok, makes sense.
> Sorry! for that. I will fix the issues.
>
I have some other fixups to do, so if this is as easy as it seems
(remove the #includes and add the forward declaration), I can fix it
up and resend it for you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
