* Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Sai Praneeth <sai.praneeth.prakhya@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Presently, only ARM uses mm_struct to manage efi page tables and efi
> runtime region mappings. As this is the preferred approach, let's make
> this data structure common across architectures. Specially, for x86,
> using this data structure improves code maintainability and readability.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> index 85f6ccb80b91..00f977ddd718 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h
> @@ -2,10 +2,14 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_X86_EFI_H
> #define _ASM_X86_EFI_H
>
> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task.h>
> +
> #include <asm/fpu/api.h>
> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
> #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>
> /*
> * We map the EFI regions needed for runtime services non-contiguously,
> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
> index f5083aa72eae..f1b7d68ac460 100644
> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
> @@ -966,6 +966,8 @@ extern struct efi {
> unsigned long flags;
> } efi;
>
> +extern struct mm_struct efi_mm;
> +
> static inline int
> efi_guidcmp (efi_guid_t left, efi_guid_t right)
> {
Ugh, I can see three problems with this patch:
1)
Why is the low level asm/efi.h header polluted with two of the biggest header
files in existence, to add a type to _another_ header (efi.h)?
2)
Why is <linux/sched/task.h> included if what is being relied on is mm_struct?
3)
But even <linux/sched/mm.h> looks unnecessary in efi.h, a simple forward
declaration of mm_struct would do ...
The high level MM and sched headers should be added to the actual .c files that
make use of them.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
