/*
> >> > + * Since we process only one efi_runtime_service() at a time, an
> >> > + * ordered workqueue (which creates only one execution context)
> >> > + * should suffice all our needs.
> >> > + */
> >> > + efi_rts_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("efi_rts_workqueue",
> >> > + 0);
> >>
> >> efi_rts_wq or efi_rts_workqueue?
> >>
> >> > + if (!efi_rts_wq) {
> >> > + pr_err("Failed to create efi_rts_workqueue, EFI runtime services "
> >>
> >> Same here.
> >
> > Sure! I will make it consistent with "efi_rts_wq". Just tried to be
> > more verbose with names :)
> >
>
> It is not a big deal, but using the exact same name is better for the purposes of
> grepping and things like that :-)
Yes, that makes sense.
> By the way, check the commit title/message, there are some others there too.
Sure! I will make changes to commit/title messages too.
Regards,
Sai
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
