> > +struct workqueue_struct *efi_rts_wq;
> > +
> > static bool disable_runtime;
> > static int __init setup_noefi(char *arg) { @@ -329,6 +331,19 @@
> > static int __init efisubsys_init(void)
> > return 0;
> >
> > /*
> > + * Since we process only one efi_runtime_service() at a time, an
> > + * ordered workqueue (which creates only one execution context)
> > + * should suffice all our needs.
> > + */
> > + efi_rts_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("efi_rts_workqueue", 0);
>
> efi_rts_wq or efi_rts_workqueue?
>
> > + if (!efi_rts_wq) {
> > + pr_err("Failed to create efi_rts_workqueue, EFI runtime services "
>
> Same here.
Sure! I will make it consistent with "efi_rts_wq". Just tried to be more verbose
with names :)
[...]
> > +#define efi_queue_work(_rts, _arg1, _arg2, _arg3, _arg4, _arg5) \
> > +({ \
> > + struct efi_runtime_work efi_rts_work; \
> > + \
> > + INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&efi_rts_work.work, efi_call_rts); \
> > + efi_rts_work.func = _rts; \
> > + efi_rts_work.arg1 = _arg1; \
> > + efi_rts_work.arg2 = _arg2; \
> > + efi_rts_work.arg3 = _arg3; \
> > + efi_rts_work.arg4 = _arg4; \
> > + efi_rts_work.arg5 = _arg5; \
> > + /* \
> > + * queue_work() returns 0 if work was already on queue, \
> > + * _ideally_ this should never happen. \
> > + */ \
> > + if (queue_work(efi_rts_wq, &efi_rts_work.work)) \
> > + flush_work(&efi_rts_work.work); \
> > + else \
> > + BUG(); \
>
> Thanks for the change! One remark, I would just do:
Sorry! but I am planning to remove BUG(). Looks like it could defeat the purpose
of patch. Please see Boris comments on the other thread.
[...]
> > +/*
> > + * efi_runtime_work: Details of EFI Runtime Service work
> > + * @func: EFI Runtime Service function identifier
> > + * @arg<1-5>: EFI Runtime Service function arguments
> > + * @status: Status of executing EFI Runtime Service
> > + */
> > +struct efi_runtime_work {
> > + u8 func;
> > + void *arg1;
> > + void *arg2;
> > + void *arg3;
> > + void *arg4;
> > + void *arg5;
> > + efi_status_t status;
> > + struct work_struct work;
> > +};
>
> Why is efi_runtime_work in the .h at all?
>
Thanks for the catch. I will move it to runtime-wrappers.c file and will make it
static too. It isn't being used in any other place.
> Please CC me for the next version! :-)
Sure! Sorry for that. I should have done in V2.
Regards,
Sai
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
