On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 04:57:18PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > mov[tw]: why? > > Then we end up battling different available immediate fields in A32/T32 > > instruction sets and v5/v6/v7 architecture versions. > > I was making the assumption that UEFI was going to be v7 only... is this not > true? There is no such requirement in the specification. It even mentions requirements for ARMv4 in one place :) But I also don't understand why ldr= should be avoided. This is not performance sensitive (called once on system boot), and it's already executing with the caches off, so even if it ends up being a literal load it does not pollute. / Leif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html