On 12/21/13 at 04:06pm, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec, at 06:02:19PM, Dave Young wrote:
> > @@ -133,6 +133,19 @@ extern void efi_sync_low_kernel_mappings(void);
> > extern void efi_setup_page_tables(void);
> > extern void __init old_map_region(efi_memory_desc_t *md);
> >
> > +struct efi_setup_data {
> > + u64 fw_vendor;
> > + u64 runtime;
> > + u64 tables;
> > + u64 smbios;
> > + u64 reserved[8];
> > + efi_memory_desc_t map[0];
> > +};
>
> [...]
>
> > +static void get_nr_runtime_map(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!efi_setup)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + nr_efi_runtime_map = (efi_data_len - sizeof(struct efi_setup_data)) /
> > + sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t);
> > +}
>
> Do we actually need the 'map' entry in efi_setup_data now that you're
> passing it via efi_info (which is much better approach!)? Also, we don't
> need the global nr_efi_runtime_map or efi_runtime_map variables now,
> right?
The map is still necessary because we need store the map somewhere and pass
the physicall address to kexec kernel. Passing them in setup_data is the
only better way currently...
In efi_info there's only an entry for the map physical address, the original
map area is not valid any more.
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
