On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 14:52 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > Apologies for late feedback. > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 05:05:12PM -0500, Mark Salter wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..1bad8a7 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,507 @@ > > +/* > > + * Extensible Firmware Interface > > + * > > + * Based on Extensible Firmware Interface Specification version 2.3.1 > > Actually, for arm64, we're relying on UEFI 2.4 or later. You're right. > > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2013 Linaro Ltd. > > And I'd say you've easily done enough here to motivate adding Red Hat. > > > + * > > + * Adapted for arm64 from arch/arm/kernel/efi.c code > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/efi.h> > > +#include <linux/export.h> > > +#include <linux/memblock.h> > > +#include <linux/of.h> > > +#include <linux/of_fdt.h> > > +#include <linux/sched.h> > > +#include <linux/slab.h> > > +#include <linux/bootmem.h> > > + > > +#include <asm/cacheflush.h> > > +#include <asm/efi.h> > > +#include <asm/tlbflush.h> > > +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> > > + > > +#define efi_early_remap(a, b) \ > > + ((__force void *)early_ioremap((a), (b))) > > Do we not want early_memremap() here, rather than early_ioremap()? > Yes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
