On 12/07/13 at 02:30pm, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 04:01:02AM -0500, Dave Young wrote: > > Hi, all > > > > Update my status: > > > > I have finished most of thecode related changes including the krealloc > > fixes (both for original code and my new code). And I'm slowly > > moving the kexec related stuff to efi_kexec.c, this involves > > some other cleanups, such as: > > efi_systab_init: > > -> move 64bit code to efi_64.c, move 32bit code to efi_32.c > > > > efi_setup global variable is changing to physical address, ioremapping > > it when necessary instead of directly using the virt addr because > > previously the virt addr will be freed until entering virtual mode, > > it's possible a leak in case something is wrong in the middle also it > > occupies the ioremap slot a little bit long. > > > > There's also other problems, so I still need a few days probably > > a week to carefully restructure the code. > > Those are all lofty goals but beware that trying to solve it all at > once can be very painful and can cause unnecessary work for both coders > and reviewers. Especially if the patchset grows out of proportion which > makes it much harder to review and deal with. > > So, from my experience and if I were you, I'd try to address the most > important issue I'm trying to fix, have 10ish nice clean patches and put > the rest on the TODO list. This is much easier to deal with for everyone > involved than trying to solve it all at once. > > Besides, if you solve it all at once, what are you going to work on > afterwards? :-) > I like your suggestion for splitting kexec stuff to another file efi_kexec.c. but yes it needs more work and is bloating the patchset, I'm fine to leave it in TODO list. Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
