On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 06:05:15PM -0700, jerry.hoemann@xxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:38:31PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Hm. If the problem is fragmentation, then yeah, I can imagine this > > causing problems. In that case we could take a two-pass approach - find > > a gap that *will* be big enough, reserve everything that isn't currently > > reserved, and then reserve the rest after ExitBootServices()? > > > Matthew, > > Did you really mean EnterVirtualMode (not ExitBootServices?) I think I actually meant SetVirtualAddressMap() :) > In one of your earlier emails you mentioned the issue is that linux makes > regions NX. That would cause problems if FW tried to execute a region > we just reserved. Unfortunately, i'm not seeing where the kernel is > doing this for crash kernel memory. Assuming it is making it NX, can > we defer that part? Or if its not, do we have a problem w/ crash kernel > reservation at all? I don't think we explicitly do that at any point for crash kernel regions. The boot services regions get toggled by efi_set_executable(). > Interesting questions, but as I don't have access to a system that has > the firmware defects encountered when efi_reserve_boot_services, it makes > it difficult to test that i don't break them. Hence, the appealing nature > of quirks. Don't have to worry about breaking other platforms as they > continue to operate same as before. Yeah. The problem is that some users may want kdump while still having broken firmware, so a solution that works for them is much more appealing than one which involves manually maintaining a list of verified systems... -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
