> >> +{
> >> + char id_str[64];
> >> + u64 id = 0;
> >> +
> >> + sprintf(id_str, "%lu%u%d", timestamp, part, count);
> >> + if (kstrtoull(id_str, 10, &id))
> >> + pr_warn("efi-pstore: failed to generate id\n");
> >> + return id;
> >> +}
> >
> > This is just odd. You make a string from three ints and then a parse
> > it to a int again.
>
> Agreed. I liked your ((timestamp * 100 + part) * 100 + count function much
> more than this.
I was worried that the part and count could be more than 100.
If it happens, the id may not be unique...
But, currently, size of nvram storage is limited, so it is a corner case.
I respect your opinion.
> @@ -125,9 +137,11 @@ static int efi_pstore_write(enum pstore_type_id type,
> efi_char16_t efi_name[DUMP_NAME_LEN];
> efi_guid_t vendor = LINUX_EFI_CRASH_GUID;
> int i, ret = 0;
> + unsigned long timestamp;
>
> + timestamp = get_seconds();
> sprintf(name, "dump-type%u-%u-%d-%lu-%c", type, part, count,
> - get_seconds(), compressed ? 'C' : 'D');
> + timestamp, compressed ? 'C' : 'D');
>
I don't think you need to change efi_pstore_write().
It is just add a local timestamp variable.
Seiji
> for (i = 0; i < DUMP_NAME_LEN; i++)
> efi_name[i] = name[i];
> --
> 1.8.4.2
?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n???{饼玮??骅w* jg????????G??⒏ ⒎?:+v???????? ????＂??????
