> Ah - I was expecting that the backend driver would have a unique "id" for > each record stored ... but is seems that this isn't true for efivars. > So, do you mean efivars should fix to use the "id" in a proper way? I acked Madper's patch 2/2 earlier today, but when I look at your test result, I'm not sure if it is reasonable for users to make multiple numbers visible to the file name. > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 17499 Oct 30 13:41 dmesg-erst-5940651313304961029--2129078373-1383165669 Seiji -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
