On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:41:43PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>
> > It will probably not be a problem on the stub side, and it's not used
> > in many places but it would break efi_lookup_mapped_address(),
> > efi_range_is_wc() and memrange_efi_to_native() for use by arm64.
> > At least the first of these would be a problem.
>
> Ok, maybe the generic header include/linux/efi.h might be a problem but
> the rest are changes to arch/x86/ which should have no effect whatsoever
> on any other arch.
Indeed - my concerns are restricted to include/linux/efi.h and
drivers/firmware/efi.c.
> Or are you planning to move some of it into generic code?
I think some of the stub code is moved to generic in Roy's/Mark's
patches - but then the stub shouldn't be an issue as in UEFI we have
4K pages.
/
Leif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
