Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Lang <david@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:06:59 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx" <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "hpa@xxxxxxxxx" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmorris@xxxxxxxxx" <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309091150570.2479@nftneq.ynat.uz>
Thread-index: AQHOrYDL2QYLBLFVskGOdCrAsfX2cpm9uPUAgAAESG6AAAOVwIAAA7CA
Thread-topic: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown

On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 11:53 -0700, David Lang wrote:

> So is there a way to unify these different things rather than creating yet 
> another different knob?

We haven't found one that people consider generally acceptable.

-- 
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����*jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: David Lang

References:
- [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: David Lang
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: David Lang
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: Matthew Garrett
- Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
  - From: David Lang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]