On Thu, 22 Aug, at 07:01:50PM, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> +static int efi_status_to_err(efi_status_t status)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + switch (status) {
> + case EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER:
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + case EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES:
> + err = -ENOSPC;
> + break;
> + case EFI_DEVICE_ERROR:
> + err = -EIO;
> + break;
> + case EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED:
> + err = -EROFS;
> + break;
> + case EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION:
> + err = -EACCES;
> + break;
> + case EFI_NOT_FOUND:
> + err = -ENODATA;
> + break;
> + default:
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
Please don't reimplement this. Instead make the existing function
global.
[...]
> +static void *load_wake_key_data(unsigned long *datasize)
> +{
> + u32 attr;
> + void *wkey_data;
> + efi_status_t status;
> +
> + if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
> + return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
> +
> + /* obtain the size */
> + *datasize = 0;
> + status = efi.get_variable(EFI_S4_WAKE_KEY_NAME, &EFI_HIBERNATE_GUID,
> + NULL, datasize, NULL);
> + if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) {
> + wkey_data = ERR_PTR(efi_status_to_err(status));
> + pr_err("PM: Couldn't get wake key data size: 0x%lx\n", status);
> + goto error;
> + }
Is it safe to completely bypass the efivars interface and access
efi.get_variable() directly? I wouldn't have thought so, unless you can
guarantee that the kernel isn't going to access any of the EFI runtime
services while you execute this function.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
