On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:46 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 11:35 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 11:22 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> On 08/19/2013 09:10 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >>> + if (!capable(CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL))
> >>> + return -EPERM;
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Stale bits?
> >
> > Yeah. Did I manage to send out the old copy of that again? I'm sorry,
> > spending a few months concentrating on cloud stuff seems to have
> > entirely destroyed my ability to deal with git :(
> >
>
> No, you mixed and matched in a single patch...
Right, but I'd fixed that in V2 (which I see I *did* send correctly, and
you're just replying to the old one :))
> I still believe that CAP_RAWIO should be forbidden in this case.
Seems fair.
--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
