You may want to check subject. If it does something, it is not dummy.
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -2784,6 +2784,13 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
> Note: increases power consumption, thus should only be
> enabled if running jitter sensitive (HPC/RT) workloads.
>
> + secureboot_enable=
> + [KNL] Enables an emulated UEFI Secure Boot mode. This
> + locks down various aspects of the kernel guarded by the
> + CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL capability. This includes things
> + like /dev/mem, IO port access, and other areas. It can
> + be used on non-UEFI machines for testing purposes.
> +
> security= [SECURITY] Choose a security module to enable at boot.
> If this boot parameter is not specified, only the first
> security module asking for security registration will be
> diff --git a/kernel/cred.c b/kernel/cred.c
> index e0573a4..c3f4e3e 100644
> --- a/kernel/cred.c
> +++ b/kernel/cred.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,23 @@ void __init cred_init(void)
> 0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
> }
>
> +void __init secureboot_enable()
> +{
> + pr_info("Secure boot enabled\n");
> + cap_lower((&init_cred)->cap_bset, CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL);
> + cap_lower((&init_cred)->cap_permitted, CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL);
> +}
OTOH you don't implement CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL, so it is dummy after
all. But CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL is infeasible to implement, right?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
