Re: [edk2] Corrupted EFI region

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 04:27:44PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I wouldn't call the design of SetVirtualAddressMap() braindead.

Ok, I've always wondered and you could probably shed some light on the
matter: why is SetVirtualAddressMap() a call-once only? Why can't I
simply call it again and update the mappings?

> I'd rather call kexec unique and somewhat unexpected :)

In all fairness, it was there before UEFI, AFAICT.

> > I wouldn't wonder if we f*cked it up again like the last time. I'll give
> > it a long hard look.
> 
> Ah sorry, by "and you guys suspect" I didn't mean to imply anything
> between the lines, I was simply trying to ascertain your working idea :)

As long as we get to the bottom of this, we're all fine. And I'd
pretty much expect everyone who is dealing with EFI to have grown a
sufficiently thick skin before starting to do so, so don't worry.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux