On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 10:27:17PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > kexec seems like a lower priority than compatibility. Perhaps keep the > > efi argument for people who want to use kexec? > > This is what I currently have in the code: if you boot with efi=1:1_map, > you get them. Well, we want the 1:1 mappings to exist all the time. The only thing the option should change is whether they're passed to SetVirtualAddressMap() or not. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
