On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 15:00 -0700, Mike Waychison wrote: > fwiw, I was tempted to rename these to ucs2_*() last time I was here. We should definitely do that. The functions aren't implementing UTF-16. Note that Windows *does* now implement UTF16 I think, but EFI still claims to be UCS2 only. If I interpret this correctly, the claim is basically that Windows was "always" actually UTF16, but just never used any of the code points where you'd be able to notice the difference: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/michkap/archive/2005/05/11/416552.aspx -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
