Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:32:13 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: Ac4mUaR2mvU0usyXI0yxxCAslUbX+Q==
Thread-topic: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL

Revocation is in the kernel. 
-- 
Matthew Garrett | matthew.garrett@xxxxxxxxxx��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����*jg��������ݢj����G�������j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Security: Add CAP_COMPROMISE_KERNEL
Next by thread: efivarfs: Bad directory entry when variable has / in name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Security] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [ECOS] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux