On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 22:33 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> That is just batshit crazy. If you have CAP_SYS_RAWIO you can do iopl()
> which means you can reprogram your northbridge, at which point you most
> definitely *can* modify the running kernel.
Well right, that's the point of this patchset - it adds some extra
permission checks to some of the existing CAP_SYS_RAWIO checks.
CAP_SYS_RAWIO hasn't meant "I can perform arbitrary pio and mmio" for
years - it means "I can do things that might maybe break something
somehow". So sure, removing CAP_SYS_RAWIO would give us basically all
the security we want in a secure boot environment, but it would also
block things that we *want* to work.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{����* jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
