Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:44:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > That does still leave me a little uneasy as far as the microcode 
> > licenses go. I don't know that we can distribute signed copies of some 
> > of them, and we obviously can't sign at the user end.
> 
> You seem to put them in signed rpm packages ?

That's not a modification of the files that say "You have permission to 
distribute unmodified versions of this file". If a lawyer says this is 
fine, I'm happy.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux