Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 09/12/08 23:43, Manu Abraham wrote: >> barry bouwsma wrote: >> ... >>> Now a completely different question -- I was pleased to see >>> that my not-too-old kernel compiled well with your mp_plus >>> source, and I read on the Wiki that certain basic tools >>> still needed to be ported to multiproto. >> >> Please use the multiproto tree rather than the multiproto_plus tree. > > I tried the multiproto version 855d0c878944, but it didn't work on > my system. My VDR doesn't recognize my DVB-T card and hangs upon startup. > When I try to unload the driver modules, the 'rmmod budget_core' appears > to hang. If I kill that, a subsequent 'lsmod' also hangs, so I need to do > a reboot - which also hangs, so a hard reset is the last resort. Digging more into this... > Then I tried the latest multiproto_plus version adf34f76ab7c, with which > VDR's startup sequence results in > > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] probing /dev/dvb/adapter0/frontend0 > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3313] CI adapter on device 0 thread started (pid=3309, tid=3313) > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] ERROR (dvbdevice.c,471): Operation not supported > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3314] section handler thread started (pid=3309, tid=3314) > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] probing /dev/dvb/adapter1/frontend0 > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3316] CI adapter on device 1 thread started (pid=3309, tid=3316) > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] ERROR (dvbdevice.c,471): Operation not supported > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3317] section handler thread started (pid=3309, tid=3317) > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] probing /dev/dvb/adapter2/frontend0 > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] ERROR (dvbdevice.c,471): Operation not supported > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3319] section handler thread started (pid=3309, tid=3319) > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] probing /dev/dvb/adapter3/frontend0 > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3309] ERROR (dvbdevice.c,471): Operation not supported > Sep 14 13:06:59 video vdr: [3321] section handler thread started (pid=3309, tid=3321) > > This is the DVBFE_GET_DELSYS call that apparently fails. Does this look like a mix up of the headers ? Also i do see a bad merge with the multiproto_plus tree with the v4l-dvb head :-/ So eventually since the IOCTL doesn't exist in the merged multiproto_plus tree, i guess that's why it is failing. Regards, Manu _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
