Markus Rechberger wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 8:03 PM, Steven Toth <stoth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Charles Price wrote: >>>> If you also feel frustrated by the multiproto situation and agree in >>>> principle with this new approach, and the overall direction of the API >>>> changes, then we welcome you and ask you to help us. >>>> >>> I wholeheartedly agree. >>> >>> Although I can't offer any programming input, I do have a variety of DVB >>> hardware and different architectures on which I can test your creations. >>> >>> Happy to help. > > not reading the parts above, but saying this is Steven, not caring > about the main people who work on something. > > There's a split between a few people here (including myself) and other > people from that scene who just don't care about anything. > > Manu and the others put in alot work, why screw what he wrote (code) > he has been on vacation (I know he married a few weeks ago - since I > got the invitation) Hauppauge people (Michael Krufky and Steven Toth) > are running their personal own game .. sorry to say that but it's that > way. > > I have logs and mails here where Steven and Mike wrote hey that would > be a cool idea about compatibility but when "I" mentioned it again and > spent work on it it was like hey we're linux only (I don't only care > about linux since I also work alot with commercial companies in that > area look at the dibcom website - Job requirement 'independent' code > neither do I want to depend on Windows nor Linux but having something > that works on both in case of hardware is fine - especially I2C is > trivial to realize for everything). > > Rethink your position and try to get people onboard but don't try to > screw people and run your own game. > > Seeing the comments Acked-By: xyz - I cannot review neither contribute > code but I can provide webspace .. hilarious. get down on earth again > Steven, Mike expecially Mauro - try to get Manufacturers onboard > instead working against you. > I talked alot with Manu he has good connections and is avoing to work > together just as I am because of certain Monopoly and copyright > infringements which you are building here (I see Mauro using leaked > code here!) . Mauro is spreading foo, Manu has the specs for xyz. I > fully understand Manu's point since Mauro did the same with me, > however .. I better don't comment it. > > Let's put another thing in here: Greg Kroah Hartman Linux Guy reverted > my patch in favour of supporting the binary Firmware upload tool of > Dell (I fully support Dell here too) although claiming to be > opensource but still running after someone (please comment this one - > it confused me at 'your' position). It was just like ok let's revert > it but not asking why?! > I'm just getting up with this just because I saw following yesterday: > 21:07 < pmp> hmm: request_firmware(&fw, CX24116_DEFAULT_FIRMWARE, > &state->i2c->dev) ? > 21:08 < pmp> the &state->i2c->dev looks strange and the kernel is > saying that about it: kobject_add failed > for i2c-1 with -EEXIST, don't try to re.... > 21:09 < pmp> other fe-driver have a callback in their config-struct... > 21:09 < pmp> I start to believe there is a reason ;) > > I better cut it now. I've learned never to expect anything different from you, such a pity. Steve _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
