Vangelis Nonas wrote: > Hello, > > I scanned using 7205 changeset. With verbose=5, I get 1801 services. > With verbose=2 I get 1725 services. > > Using the 7201 changeset with verbose=5 I get 2082 services. I can check > for verbose=2 and changeset 7201 if you think it is useful. It would be nice to see changeset 7201 with verbose=1 and 2, the results. > I have the "feeling" that 7201 behaves better. It is much faster also > during scanning( I don't have measurements but I am pretty sure). You can enable timestamps being output in printk's in the kernel config to see the timestamps, with which you compare with the start - stop events in the logs. > Should you need kernel logs for failing transponders either 7201 or 7205 > let me know. Will need the logs for the failing transponders in 7205, to check for the actual cause. Regards, Manu > > Regards > Vagelis > > > > > Manu Abraham wrote: >> Vangelis Nonas wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I tried scanning with the 7201 changeset and I believe the results >>> are better than the 7205 changeset. In the former case I get 2082 >>> services on hotbird, in the latter 1722. >>> >> >> Hmm.. Ok. >> >> Can you please get 7205 and load the stb0899 and stb6100 modules with >> verbose=2 or 5 as module parameters and see whether it makes any >> difference ? >> (ie you see more of the services) ie check whether changing the module >> parameters >> (verbosity level) makes any difference in the number of services found. >> >>> I'll shortly send kernel logs for a failing transponder during scan. >>> >>> And something else: >>> When I give to scan the parameter -o vdr it will not output the >>> results after a complete scan. >> >> Ok, this i had not added in, will look at this aspect. >> >> Regards, >> Manu >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
