2007/11/22, Antti Palosaari <crope@xxxxxx>: > hei > I got current channel list from operator and make & update files against > it. New tuning files attached. There is also list I got from the operator. > > List of all 3KTV networks and proper tuning file: > operator reference channels fi-3KTV > Lahti fi-Lahti > Kuopio fi-Kuopio > Oulu fi-Oulu (same channels as old fi-Oulu, only cosmetic changes) > Lohja fi-Lohja > Savonlinna fi-3KTV > Mikkeli fi-3KTV > Iisalmi fi-Iisalmi > Kajaani fi-3KTV > Ylivieska fi-3KTV > Salo fi-Salo (replace existing with this one) > Raisio fi-3KTV > Laitila fi-Laitila > Rauma fi-3KTV (old can be removed totally from dvb-apps, uses reference > channels) > Pori fi-3KTV > Karjaa fi-3KTV > Virrat fi-3KTV > Kotka fi-Kotka > Parainen fi-Parainen > > regards > Antti The proposed splitting is a bit problematic, because you have specific entries and a "fallback" (maybe cause some confusion among users). And it is hard to check as I _quite_ soon realised. As you have all the necessary information in one table I decided to create a single file containing every case (it isn't the smallest one, I know, but within the limits and quite easy to review and maintain). Thank you very much for your effort! Christoph > Antti Palosaari wrote: > > Christoph Pfister wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> (sorry for the late reply) > > no problem :) > >> Am Dienstag 13 November 2007 schrieb Antti Palosaari: > >>> hello > >>> There is file containing reference channels used in 3KTV networks around > >>> the Finland. There is about 20 3KTV networks but all didn't use exactly > >>> same channel list for reason or other. > >>> > >>> Now there is fi-Rauma and fi-Salo that contains same channels, should > >>> those removed? > >> If 3KTV is the provider meant with those files, yes. If it's > >> just "coincidence" that a different provider uses the same initial params, no > >> (to ensure that you can adjust stuff independently when something changes in > >> future). Afair fi-Salo contains the network operated by SSP (Salon Seudun > >> puhelin), so as long as that isn't the same as 3KTV (due to a renaming etc > >> etc) fi-Salo shouldn't be removed. Dunno about fi-Rauma ... > > hmm, that whole 3KTV / Finnet / local operators situation wasn't clear > > for me some time back, thats why I send fi-Salo... > > > > * 3KTV is cable network operator owned by Finnet. > > * Finnet is union of the few local operators > > * SSP, Salo, is local operator > > * Lännen Puhelin, Rauma, is local operator > > * Oulun Puhelin, Oulu, is local operator > > > > I am not sure how it exactly goes, but I think local networks are owned > > by local operators, but channel feed (and reference settings) are coming > > from 3KTV. Most local operators uses just those reference channel maps > > given by 3KTV. But there is still some who not, from reason or other. > > Looks like Oulu, Kuopio, Lohja and Kotka are deviating from 3KTV > > reference settings. From this situation, correct way to do this is > > adding files for fi-3KTV, fi-Oulu, fi-Kuopio, fi-Lohja and fi-Kotka. I > > think I will make and send initial tuning files for these missing ones > > using channel map that differs from the reference. > > > > There is old and very readable channel map for clarify this situation: > > http://www.lumonetti.fi/export/download/kanavanippujen_taajuudet310806.PDF > > > > And if this is not fuzzy enough, I can say that for example Oulun > > Puhelin and Lännen Puhelin are not members of the Finnet anymore... They > > and some more just left Finnet union and are now known as dna. > > > > Regards > > Antti Palosaari > > -- > http://palosaari.fi _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
